I’m beginning to get a sense of the Right vs the Left down here in AmericaLand. You could sum up my impression fairly by saying that the Left favours regulation to protect individuals against unreasonable business practices, where the Right favours the free market above all else (if an individual doesn’t like the way a given company is treating him, he can exercise his Right to Choose, and take his business elsewhere). What that means, in essence, is that if a corporation gets itself into the position where it can casually rape and pillage us all into the stone age, well, congratulations, high fives. Capitalism Works.
But that’s just my opinion. If looking at the simple facts can be called opinion.
In principle, that’s what America The Free is all about — we all equally have the God Given Right to seek our fortunes, and if we win an unassailable advantage over the competition then we’ve earned it with all our hard work and we’re Living the American Dream. The market just happens to be working in our favour. Or something. It sounds great.
Never mind that, in reality, whoever has the power tends to act to keep it that way.
In my opinion, responsible and careful legislation is necessary to protect the individual from the skull-fucking corporations that could not possibly care less about us so long as we keep their bottom line black. The current structure of the health unsurance system is the perfect example. Any company that would let you die rather than pay your claim should not be protected by the Constitution. Full stop.
A less lethal but just as valid example is the current chaos over the principles of Net Neutrality. Put simply, most of us feel that the intertubes should be free, and open, and as unfettered as possible by the trappings of the bloated, twisted, broken system in which most of us have to live. No throttles, no blocks, no filtering, no bullshit tiers. The free market system is based on the idea that if you can figure out how to control a commodity, you can charge whatever the market will bear for access to that commodity. That, again, sounds great. It really does.
The FCC is responsibly and carefully considering regulation which will guarantee equal access to the web for all. This proudly upholds the All-American principle of freedom for individuals. Equal rights for all. No preferential treatment for anyone. Effectively, this regulation would prevent ISPs from filtering any legal traffic in any way. Just like roads. Anyone can use them for anything, so long as it’s legal.
John McCain would like you to believe that this action is actually un-American, a “government takeover” that will stifle innovation. This is absolutely fascinating for me. He and the movement he represents (chiefly made up of the ISPs themselves) are actually trying to convince us that black is white.
Their perspective, though they can’t state it honestly (because it’s not terribly popular), is that businesses should be free to run their business. The government, for better or worse, should stay out of it. This is the sentiment, again, that brought us the ridiculous, murderous profiteering health unsurance system.
To bottom line it for you, they want to be left free to choose (for us) which traffic they like, and which they don’t, and stifle the latter.
To illustrate, this means that Bing could pay AT&T to favour their traffic over Google, and that would be the end of painfully slow Google unless they paid to compete. Bing could then charge us to use Bing as the only show in town, splitting the profits with AT&T. Loser = us. Then it gets proper fucked– AT&T would offer a premier tier, where we could pay for unfiltered (or less filtered) bandwidth, so we could continue to use our beloved Google. So, without changing one single iota of the bandwidth speeds they are currently supporting, AT&T (or whoever) is suddenly making money hand over fist.
Just imagine what YouTube would have to pay to remain the video site of choice. Next up: Microsoft My Video Place, only $10 a month for a whole gig of downstream! And one free video upload a month! Only $50 for the premium service!
And so on.
Look, the reason Google is winning is because they are free and ad supported, but in a nice way. We don’t get splattered with intrusive flashing, popping, noisy garbage like the old days. We chose Google, and Google is mindful that if they treat us with respect we will stay loyal. Google knows that if they offer everything for free, they will have the traffic, and that means eyeballs on ads. And that means money. It’s just smart business. Long view smart. Not gouge you and rape you and treat you like a bitch because you have no real choice smart.
If John McCain gets what he wants, make no mistake, everything you love about the web is history. Only people who can pay will get to play, on both sides of the ISPs. How this is supposed to promote jobs and innovation is utterly beyond me.
PCWorld has a Net Neutrality FAQ right here. Get informed. Use your voice. Before you have to pay for the privilege.
